Vielä kommentteja EU:n tuontisuojan päivityksiin, jotka rosteripuolella jäivät vähän odotustasolle paremmasta…
Europe’s stainless steel industry has had a mixed reaction to the European Commission’s safeguard steel review and its action plan to protect the bloc’s metals industry, both announced on 11 March. Steelmakers have welcomed greater commitment from policy makers to support the sector, but are still concerned at a lack of concrete commitment to significant protectionist measures, while traders, service centres and scrap suppliers are worried the most radical proposals could severely damage their businesses.
The European Commission’s review of definitive safeguard measures on imports of certain steel products identified no new import pressure for stainless cold rolled sheets and strips, and left tariff rate quotas for the next 15 months virtually unchanged even as carryovers and unused quota access were removed. And the commission’s European Steel and Metals Action Plan included proposals to curb imports of finished steel and exports of scrap alongside the extension of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to potentially include raw material exports and downstream products.
European stainless steel flat producers — battling weak medium-term demand and a high cost structure — expressed disappointment on the absence of protectionism in the safeguard review through to July 2026, but told Argus they were encouraged by proposals in the Action Plan that acknowledge the need to to curb imports for domestic industry’s long term health.
“The industry remains threatened by global excess capacities and by global distortions from China and other countries that artificially support their domestic industries or circumvent the current measures,” Finnish producer Outokumpu told Argus. “These challenges need to be mitigated with more assertive solutions, including replacing current safeguards with more effective measures from July 2026.”
European trading groups surveyed by Argus welcomed the stability offered by the unchanged import quotas as the industry navigates other pressures — such as high energy prices and US tariffs — but said they expect lobbying by producers to drive a wave of new measures in the fourth quarter of this year, with stainless steel-specific safeguards likely to be implemented from next year.
“Current quotas will only last this year, if you ask me,” a trader said. “We expect new regulation to be announced in September/October.”
A key area of focus for the industry is the possible introduction of the melt-and-pour clause, which determines the origin of goods by the location at which the metal is originally melted, and disregards third countries where further processing may take place for circumvention of anti-dumping duties. The EU stopped short of immediately implementing this clause as part of the Action Plan, and will conduct further assessment of the action. But market participants expect [consultation](Argus direct] on the policy will start after the current safeguard period ends.
Several large European stainless steel producers are heard to be importing slab from Asia, and traders told Argus they were relieved that melt and pour is not coming into play this year. A Spanish trader said the clause will level the playing field for European producers, but a hasty implementation this year would have simply added to costs for both producers and consumers in the near term. Outokumpu said it welcomes the melt-and-pour proposals as part of a wider anti-circumvention drive that it said is required in Europe.
The EU’s Action Plan also calls for the need to address carbon leakage of exported steel through a potential extension of the CBAM to include exports. Trading groups told Argus this will be difficult to implement across the spectrum of trading partners, and may render exports uncompetitive to the detriment of European service centre groups.
Outokumpu called upon the need to leverage the EU’s competitive advantage by including Scope 2 emissions within any CBAM regulation for downstream products.
“It is critical to prevent European steel producers from being placed at a disadvantage from imports with higher emissions from energy usage,” the group said. “Outokumpu uses low-carbon energy across its operations with a high-recycling rate, so a fair benchmark definition is necessary to ensure that our low-emission production receives the competitive advantage it deserves.”
The EU’s action plan also proposes the potential introduction of export duties for all steel scrap in order to limit scrap leakage from the bloc. Stainless steel scrap traders surveyed by Argus said there was no chance such a move would ever be implemented as Europe simply cannot consume all the scrap it produces, and that recyclers use exports to keep prices at a level that encourages further investment.
“We would drown in scrap if exports fell,” a trader said. “Prices would decrease sharply and work like a subsidiary for an antique industry. High-end recycling plants need high prices to process complex materials which would end up in landfill otherwise. No investments would be made if prices are pushed into the ground.”
Trade bodies BIR and EuRIC suggested a more rational move could be to introduce mandatory recycled content targets for metals products that incentivises domestic demand and usage for scrap, while also allowing scrap to move freely to export markets.