Onneks sä olet täällä!
Kiitos paljon tää taas selvensi.
Sovittiin jo Hyzon ketjussa ettei verrata päärynöitä kananmuniin mutta ajattelin sen tehdä silti.
Eli Hypoint:
HyPoint vs. existing hydrogen fuel cell systems
The system offers many additional advantages over traditional hydrogen fuel cell systems:
- 3x higher specific power (2,000 W/kg vs. 700 W/kg) – with plans to increase to 3,000 W/kg by 2024
- Climate independence (easy to cool, doesn’t use water, impervious to freezing)
- Lower hydrogen quality requirements (CO: 1% vs 0.0001%) → lower operational costs
- Simpler design: fewer parts → higher reliability, lower acquisition and maintenance costs
- Suitability for large scale integration with manned and unmanned airborne applications
- More reliable under overload (important in emergency case)
Eli ymmärränkö nyt oikein:
ZeroAvia selected Hyzon’s fuel cell stack for this evaluation due to its industry-leading power density. As confirmed by leading technical certification provider TUV Rheinland, Hyzon’s Gen3 fuel cell stack achieves a volumetric power density above 6.0 kW/liter and gravimetric power density more than 5.5 kW/kg, well above industry averages. These factors are critical in aviation to minimize weight while providing sufficient power for the desired performance.
Siis tämä Hypoint joo on tehnyt kennon ilmailuun 2kw/kg ja meinaa kehittää 4kw/kg vuoteen 2024 vai onko nyt luetun ymmärtämisessäkin opeteltavaa?